Time to read
less than1 minute
Measuring Provider Performance: Challenges and Definitions
SummaryText
This report is the first in a series of Better Practices publications. It presents definitions of performance from the field of Human Performance Technology and summarises presentations and discussions on adapting such definitions to the area of family planning and reproductive health care (FP/RH).
This report is based on a meeting held in Chapel Hill in December 2001. It offers examples of designs and methods for measuring provider performance and reviews the relative strengths and weaknesses of each approach. The final sections of the publication describe the group's attempt to arrive at a consensus of how to measure individual provider performance. The goal of this process is to apply better practices in real-world situations.
The need to measure “performance” in the field of family planning and reproductive health care (FP/RH) is widely recognised. There is however no consensus on a standard definition of the term. Consequently, the word may be used in ambiguous or even contradictory ways.
Click here to download the document as a PDF file.
This report is based on a meeting held in Chapel Hill in December 2001. It offers examples of designs and methods for measuring provider performance and reviews the relative strengths and weaknesses of each approach. The final sections of the publication describe the group's attempt to arrive at a consensus of how to measure individual provider performance. The goal of this process is to apply better practices in real-world situations.
The need to measure “performance” in the field of family planning and reproductive health care (FP/RH) is widely recognised. There is however no consensus on a standard definition of the term. Consequently, the word may be used in ambiguous or even contradictory ways.
Click here to download the document as a PDF file.
- Log in to post comments











































