People Speak - United States
The People Speak: America Debates Its Role in the World is a non-partisan, non-political national debate series launched by the United Nations Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Open Society Institute. Organisers hope that citizens will organise as many as 1,000 individual debates on the subject of USA foreign policy from October 5-18 2003. The purpose of the public education effort is to stimulate perspectives and opinions through local community events prior to the beginning of the campaign for the 2004 Presidential elections.
Communication Strategies
Citizens are urged to get involved by organising a debate in their communities. Organisers are urged to convene 20-100 people at a convenient location (public library, university, restaurant, coffee shop, conference room, or community member's home) to participate in a discussion of USA foreign policy. A moderator and at least 2 panelists/debaters should be present to lead the discussion.
A debate kit is designed to ease the planning process. It includes the four resolutions proposed for debate, each of which addresses a different aspect of national security policy. Debate on these resolutions is intended to serve as the foundation for community discussion about strategic options ranging from unilateral preemption to multilateralism. The resolutions include: the legitimate use of force, non-military issues affecting U.S. national security interests, democracy promotion, and international institutions and norms. Accompanying the resolutions is a list of suggested pro and con arguments and a list of resources. The kit also includes sample letters for soliciting debaters and moderators, sample press and promotion materials, and guidelines for the format of the debate. This kit is available for free download on the Join the Debate website. This site also features a map indicating planned activities happening in and around communities across the United States.
Modest funds are available upon request to help finance these events.
A debate kit is designed to ease the planning process. It includes the four resolutions proposed for debate, each of which addresses a different aspect of national security policy. Debate on these resolutions is intended to serve as the foundation for community discussion about strategic options ranging from unilateral preemption to multilateralism. The resolutions include: the legitimate use of force, non-military issues affecting U.S. national security interests, democracy promotion, and international institutions and norms. Accompanying the resolutions is a list of suggested pro and con arguments and a list of resources. The kit also includes sample letters for soliciting debaters and moderators, sample press and promotion materials, and guidelines for the format of the debate. This kit is available for free download on the Join the Debate website. This site also features a map indicating planned activities happening in and around communities across the United States.
Modest funds are available upon request to help finance these events.
Development Issues
Political Development.
Key Points
President Bush laid out his administration's thinking about American security policy in September 2002, in The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Too often, organisers say, debate about key issues like those outlined in this document is confined to a small policy elite. In an effort to broaden the debate, in summer 2003 the United Nations Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Open Society Institute funded a report of the Council on Foreign Relations that describes three different approaches to security policy, ranging from unilateral preemption to multilateralism. The People Speak uses that report as a springboard to stimulate a national dialogue rooted in local community events.
Partners
Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the United Nations Foundation, the League of Women Voters, Open Society Institute, National Peace Corps Association, United Nations Association of the United States of America, Center for Women Policy Studies, and the Council on Foreign Relations.
Sources
Letter sent from Timothy E. Wirth to The Communication Initiative on August 27 2003; and Join the Debate site.











































