The Situation of Communication for Social Change in Korea
(or media activism for democratic communication)
and the case of Labor News Production
Click here to download a Power Point presentation of this case study.
Outline
1 Background Information
2 Overall Situation on Communication for Social Change
- 1. Background
2. Progress
3. Issues
3 Labour News Production since Feb, 1989
- 1. Funding Sources
2. Main Partners in activities
3. The Social Situation Wants to Change
4. Main Activities and Objectives
5. Main Tool Utilized
6. Participatory Project
7. Social impact of Project
8. Main Obstacles and Constraints
9. Main Challenges
3 Labour News Production since February, 1989
- 1. Funding Sources
2. Main Partners in Activities
3. The Social Situation
4. Main Activities and Objectives
5. Main Tool Utilized
6. Participatory Project
7. Social Impact of the Project
8. Main Obstacles and Constraints
Background Information
45 million population in South Korea
Fast developing (developed) society: economically, hi-tech
- Strong democratic labor movement since 1987
- IMF crisis --> Neoliberalist policy
- Economic booming mainly based on IT industry
Widening gap bet poor and rich, job insecurity, cutting wages
Corrupt conservative politics which has been losing support
- NGO movement + New political movement from labor Technological advance: 20 million Internet users, 10 million cellular phones, So called venture capitalists (Kosdaq)
- Causing crisis, providing tools for democratic communication
- Always struggle on communication and media
Overall Situation on Communication for Social Change
-Protagonists-
Government Corporation
Public Institute Mainstream media
(KFC, KBI, KBC, IT dept...) (public, private)
Independent film and videos, video activism
Watchdog groups, NGOs Alternative (Civil ?)
(IT) Trade unions media
IT activists
A. Changing stance of Public Institute
Beginning of being partially public
Significant change by political change and advocacy
Ex. Media center policy, new funding policy by KBI and KFC (although strong policy trend of Neoliberalism)
B. New legal frameworks
Broadcasting law, film and video law passed
Introduction of new concepts and partial elimination of censorship (Due to political change and also long struggle and lobby by activists)
C. Booming of Independent (alternative) Videos
Establishment of KIFV (Association), legal status. This group is critical of mainstream media and armed with DV technology and Internet
D. Progressive Trade Union: More aware of media
Relatively conservative stance of Broadcasting TUs
E. Interests in new alternative forms of media
Especially on Public Access, IT's
F. Using computer mediated communication (inc. Internet)
Widely by NGOs, TU movement, etc.
2. Progress
Battle on Public Access: New broadcasting law guarantees access to national public TV, satellite TV and cable TV.
- Article 69 : KBS must carry the programs made directly by the viewers,based on the presidential decree.
- Article 70 : Cable system operator and satellite operator must air the programs directly made by the viewers if the viewers demand to be aired through local channel or public channel, if there is no special reason for refusing to air.
- The battle on policy will continue until June.
- Establishing the association of organizations for viewers participation TV program (AVPTVP) : Exec committee, Policy committee, Production committee, Media center branch (22 orgs)
Establishing NGO, TU's own IT network
- Korean Progressive Network (Jinbo Net : www.jinbo.net)
Experiment on Internet Webcasting
Possibility of (NGO) TV channel
- Establishing the channel owned by coalition of NGOs
- Battle on acquiring satellite channel by Coalition
Possibility of Introducing community radio structure
- Change of policy level
- Strategy of using new media to prepare old media
Possibility of establishing regional media center as a basis for media literacy, public access and independent media
- KBI, KBC -- KIFV, AVPTVP
3. Issues: New Area of Communication for Social Change
Freedom of expression (Anti-posco case)
Participatory process versus possible bureaucracy in activism
Activism with hi-tech leads to role of international solidarity
Self-Sustainment versus external funding
Shortage of traditional alternative audio-visual media producers
Experiments for which direction and which goal?
Labour News Production since February, 1989
(www.lnp89.org)
1. Funding Sources
80 % of the annual budget comes from LNP's own activities
5% from individual supporters
15% from rare public funding
2. Main partners in activities
Trade unions affiliated with KCTU
People's coalition for media reform (PCMR)
Association of Korean independent film and videomakers (KIFV)
Korean progressive network (Jinbo Net)
Korean LaborNet (Nodong Net), etc.
3. The social situation that LNP wants to change
Strengthening democratic and progressive labor movement as an essential part of the social movement.
Making the democratic media situation
--> Catalyst for using media for progressive labor movement
Strengthening internal participatory and democratic process
4. Main activities and objectives: Still small organization
(7 in production, 4 in research) but broadening activities
- Production newsreel, educational video, historical documentary never been aired in Korean broadcasting but have widely been distributed
- Archive: 3,000 hours of archive
- Training: Media literacy + self representation of the people various training programs
- Organizing and networking Workers' video making groups
Core networking role for sharing the information - Solidarity
KIFV, Jinbo Net (http://www.jinbo.net)
Nodong Net (http://www.nodong.net)
Anti-censorship forum
Project for Peoples' TV
People's coalition for media reform
Human rights film festival
International coalition Videazimut (http://www.videazimut.org)
LaborMedia 97, LaborMedia 99 (http://lmedia.nodong.net)
ex) special Mayday web project (http://mayday.nodong.net) - Research:separate branch research group bi-weekly web zine called PRISM (http://prism.jinbo.net - just Korean version)
- Distribution & Festival (ex: festival web site) Cassette distribution in the movement and film showcases Plans for broadcasting
5. Main tool utilized
Video
CMC: LNP(internet and BBS), PRISM
Webcasting (http://mayday.nodong.net)
6. Participatory project
Internal participatory structure
Co-production ex) [One step at a time]
With the people, not about the people
Activity of helping rank and file workers on video
Subjects covered by research departments shared with people
7. Social impact of the project
The video became an essential part of the labor education and information exchange
Initiative in establishing new organizations and events
International information exchange
The result of advocacy in the activism, and in the legislation
8. Main obstacles and constraints
Misconception, Fear of democratic media
Financial difficulties
Political oppression
9. Main Challenges
a. Organization restructuring for co-ordinating broadened activities
b. Participatory, bottom-up policy making
c. Bridging the separate activism and separate policy makers
(Alternative approach to media convergence)
d. Overcoming marginalized sector of labor communication through having strong coalition and networking
e. Focus on specific goal with the viewpoint on structural change
Topic Two
Details about this topic
Supporting information and examples
How it relates to your audience
Topic Three
Details about this topic
Supporting information and examples
How it relates to your audience
- Log in to post comments











































